Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 3AngelaD
Perhaps but the WH folk definitely did NOT care at all for Trent Lott. Guess they thought he was "too independent."

Actually, I believe that Frist did exactly what the WH wanted even though it appeared not to be the case publically.

39 posted on 11/29/2006 9:04:17 AM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: zerosix
...the WH folk definitely did NOT care at all for Trent Lott.

He publicly celebrated and gloated over some of our defeats. Personally, I think the old Dixiecrat might have threatened to switch parties to the Dims if they hadn't given him the #2 slot. I'm not kidding. He's a snake. Well, a smooth political snake but still...

The White House was smart to oppose Lott.
42 posted on 11/29/2006 9:15:43 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: zerosix
Perhaps but the WH folk definitely did NOT care at all for Trent Lott. Guess they thought he was "too independent."

BOTTOM LINE: Democrats can have a "macacca" moment and get away with it, for Republicans, it is one strike and you are out. It is the unwritten rule of politics.

68 posted on 11/30/2006 8:33:46 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson