since when is an oath before God a 'religious test'? As I said, the person need not even beleive in God to make the oath, as long as he is in agreement with upholding hte will of the poeple that he swear before God. And as stated before, the person may not beleive in God, but will still be held accountable by God regardless of His beleifs, which we in America take seriously & feel should be required for swearing oath. you're on shaky ground claiming that swearing oath is a 'religious test' an oath isn't in any way a test of one's beleif, but a requirement of office- it doesn't force anyone to believe anything
Invocation of a supernatural or holy being called to verify the veracity of a statement
An oath was a special appeal, an expression of sincerity backed up by the threat of divine retribution should the uttering prove falsehence the term oath-breaker. An oathbreaker was assumed to have committed a crime against God or of some divine entity, which would lead to damnation or another form of severe penalty.
you are swearing an oath TO the constitution BEFORE God- that's the difference here.
An oath is no small matter- it was originally meant ot be given and upheld even unto death- Yes, people are no longer taken at their word- however, that still does not mean oaths have lost their meaning or importance. Here's an interesting link http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/wp-print.php?p=236