Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meandog; ninenot; sittnick; ArrogantBustard; Tax-chick; TonyRo76; AnAmericanMother; ...
Meandog: We started out to homeschool and did well at it and certainly encourage even modestly educated parents to do so. I have a bachelor's degree MCL in history and a doctorate in law. My wife graduated from Yale. We also understand that homeschooling is not for everyone.

Public schooling is not for everyone either and I would suggest that it is, by its nature, a dumping ground of last resort. My kids are going to get one education. Why should I put them in public schools???? Why should I put them in the hands of merely parochial schools?

I have one life to live and absolutely NO INTEREST in squabbling endlessly with public school teachers or bureaucrats. My kids will learn what I and my wife want them to learn---no more, no less. Planned Barrenhood will have absolutely NOTHING to do with their education whether publicly or sneakily. My children learn, will learn and have learned to be furiously Catholic.

Traditional Catholic homeschooling parents here in our part of Illinois (NW) have formed our own school according to our own tastes. Latin begins in grammar school using the same texts as my old Jesuit prep school used in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s. They also learn literature, algebra, geometry, science (not atheist propaganda), grammar and literacy generally, theology, history (using Samuel Eliot Morison for American History in Junior High which most colleges would not dare to use), world history, geography and a whole lot more.

My wife teaches there and has no trouble having conferences with parents. Out of state parents are finding local parents to house their kids during the school year so that they can attend the school. Even they come here for conferences when asked. The tuition is about 1/6 of the public edjamakshun per pupil spending in Westchester County, cited somewhere above. No tax money whatsoever goes into this school. There is no cherry-picking in admissions and we have had special education kids. We test only for academic achievement to determine which classes the new student is ready to start.

Why should my kids be deprived of a first rate education in order for us to try to save a public school system which we despise for many, many good and sufficient reasons? I don't think that public educators even begin to imagine just how very much genuinely religiously responsible parents and other taxpayers hate what passes for "education" in public schools.

I am sorry that many other parents do not see the virtues of abandoning John Dewey's/Horace Mann's dream and our national nightmare. I am responsible before God for the upbringing of my children. My accounting had better not be: Well, I did not know any better or Everyone else was sending their kids to public schools. I won't send my kids to the increasingly pathetic parochial school system in this, one of the most conservative dioceses in the US. Somewhat feminist Sister Mary Pantsuit serves as diocesan superintendent and is no better than the gummint schoolcrats and the results show it. She even wants certification of teachers.

Is there some reason for parents to attend parent-teacher soirees at your school? Will it make any difference whatsoever in the institutional mediocrity that is public schooling?

Even if SCOTUS were not the stubborn secular humanist engine that it is (fully competitive with public schools), I would not expect public schools to teach your children what I believe. By their very nature public schools teach the lowest common denominator and it gets lower each year. And finally, as ever, you suggest still MORE money be thrown away at these failed schools in the form of merit pay. How about an end to tenure and the ability to recognize a lack of merit by reducing bad teachers to minimum wage to go along with merit pay? Why is it a one-way street? My wife has a real education in English Literature at Yale and I guarantee that no faculty member at your school would be caught dead taking her paycheck or perks. A BIG part of her compensation is the sheer pleasure of teaching the kids. Her school is nothing but merit.

The problem with public schools is that they exist at all.

359 posted on 11/27/2006 12:27:30 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

I have to wonder then (in reading your long post) what do you have against private schools? You state that you went to a Catholic prep school, so why don't you send your kids there? Homeschooling to me is analogous to the lawyer that tries to represent himself in court...okay, granted, your public school system may be bad but Catholic schools are not and their faculties are a darn site better at educating student than moms or dads.


365 posted on 11/27/2006 12:49:55 PM PST by meandog (These are the times that try men's souls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk
You'll have better luck speaking Latin to my dead dog.

Every blessed thing you say is true but you two inhabit two totally different intellectual universes.

That is one reason that back in the day we Catholics could only marry other Catholics

396 posted on 11/27/2006 2:18:02 PM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk; meandog

Dear BlackElk,

You're a far more charitable person than I am to even deign to discuss education with the NEA shill.

I guess the irony of the authorship escapes the original poster, in that we have a janitor lecturing us on the need to have professional educators teaching our children. Perhaps I'll get a second opinion on that. From a ditch-digger, or the fellow cleaning the windows down at the local car wash.

It's sadly pathetic that the NEA couldn't find anyone with any credentials to write this nonsense, as well as bitterly ironic, considering that the NEA is always pounding on homeschoolers for their very lack of NEA-approved "credentials."

Frankly, if I hadn't gone to the NEA website to verify that it was posted therein, I'd have sworn that this had originated on scrappleface.

It's just too funny.


sitetest


404 posted on 11/27/2006 2:48:24 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson