To: Man50D
I'm waiting, with bated breath, to hear the police dept's explanation for ventilating admittedly unarmed men at 4 AM.
Since all honest conservatives have deep distrust of the police power, I wonder why freepers line up behind the gun-men, especially when there was no apparent imminent threat. (Hint: don't even try to tell me that a drunken driver is deserving of being shot full of holes.)
To: hinckley buzzard
I'm waiting, with bated breath, to hear the police dept's explanation for ventilating admittedly unarmed men at 4 AM/Since all honest conservatives have deep distrust of the police power, I wonder why freepers line up behind the gun-men, especially when there was no apparent imminent threat.
You don't need to wait. You obviously have conducted a thorough objective investigation. I suggest you hand over your report to the Police so they can learn how a well reasoned report based on facts and not assumptions can be done.
(Hint: don't even try to tell me that a drunken driver is deserving of being shot full of holes.)
I wouldn't think of telling you anything to the contrary since you have all the answers. Congratulations Sherlock!
72 posted on
11/26/2006 8:39:52 PM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: hinckley buzzard
I wonder why freepers line up behind the gun-men, especially when there was no apparent imminent threat.Al Sharpton's support of the ventilated men strongly suggests that they had it coming to 'em. No final determination should be made until we know what really happened, but leaning towards support of those Sharpton opposes is generally a good starting point.
85 posted on
11/26/2006 9:35:55 PM PST by
Junior_G
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson