Posted on 11/24/2006 8:53:34 AM PST by TexKat
The French set up their positions in a valley surrounded by mountains. Now how stupid is that? If the French would have had competent leadership the outcome could have been much different.
Do tell.
My guess this is reference to the fact that the world, including the Clinton administration, did nothing for months while the genocide went ahead at full speed. By the time we got involved in August 1994, it was just to provide food and aid to those still alive in the refugee camps in what was then Zaire.
Some facts here:
1. The day after that former Hutu leader was killed in 1994, the genocide began. The Hutus seemed to be looking for an excuse to begin the genocide. Most observers think radical Hutus killed that leader, not Kagame. If Kagame's Tutsi people had done it, how were the Hutus able to begin the genocide so quickly?
2. France supported the Hutus throughout the genocide while the Hutus killed the Tutsis. After it was over, one of the Rwandan officials asked a French official why they did so. The French position was that the Tutsis were doing guerilla operations from Uganda, which was an English-speaking country. The French didn't want an English-speaking country to exert influence over a French-speaking country. The Rwandan offical replied that in three months, one million French speakers had been killed.
France's behavior in the Rwandan genocide was so completely immoral that they have no right to lecture the U.S. on anything for another generation. Rwanda did the right thing by kicking the French out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.