Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob

The changes brought on by the emergence of Rock and Roll are still very much with us.


199 posted on 11/22/2006 11:21:25 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

Most certainly not with me- I'm tone deaf [glory be] and thus immune to the audible baboonery.


211 posted on 11/22/2006 12:17:40 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

> The changes brought on by the emergence of Rock and Roll are still very much with us. <

1. "Rock and roll" was little more than "rhythm and blues" -- but performed mostly by whites rather than by blacks.

2. "Rhythm and blues" was basically a simplified form of jazz.

3. There's no question that Louis Armstrong had more influence upon jazz than any other musician, both from the vocal and from the instrumental perspectives.

4. It follows logically that Elvis Presley and "rock and roll as a whole" would never have developed as they did without the prior influence of Louis Armstrong.

5. Ergo, Louis Armstrong should be ranked higher than Elvis Presley in terms of musical influence.

But on the other hand, if we ignore musical matters and consider only the abysmal decline of American culture and social values since 1954, then Elvis goes right to the top of the list!


222 posted on 11/22/2006 1:17:05 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson