Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
No. The simple fact is that it is NOT true.

Why not, exactly? I'm not sure what your point about WWI was, other than to point out that once upon a time, upper class types volunteered be officers, in order to send poor grunts charging at entrenched machine guns.

Regardless, America, 2006 is a long, long way from America, 1917. Back then, everyone knew someone affected by the war. Nowadays, outside of more conservative circles, it's pretty rare. For most of my civilian friends, I'm the only one they know that's been to Iraq, and they consider that quite a novelty. Knowing a WWI vet in 1921 wasn't considered novel in any way.

62 posted on 11/22/2006 6:40:41 AM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Steel Wolf
I'm not sure what your point about WWI was, other than to point out that once upon a time, upper class types volunteered be officers, in order to send poor grunts charging at entrenched machine guns.

Society was more class-centered then, true. However, this isn't all that relevant a distinction -- being an officer in WWI wasn't all that much safer than being a grunt.

77 posted on 11/22/2006 7:35:39 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson