You may, of course, continue to think what you think about CO2, human activities, and climate. Your viewpoint, however, is incorrect.
let me get this straight- you first complain that human production of CO2 is the cause of all our woes concerning warming- then you say CO2 is not invovled? You're losing me here. SO2 'can' affect- No, SO2 DOES affect ozone much more so than CO2 as the environuts claim- SO2 is not the only source of pollutants emitted by volcanos, it's one of many that contribute to greenhouse effects.- And furhter- CO2Science.com has been monitoring supposed global temperature 'rises' for decades and there is NO clear evidence for a consistent rise in temperature DESPITE what you've been told- infact, there is more evidence for cooling
There are several sites that expose te fallicy of global warming
http://www.warwickhughes.com/climate/index.htm
http://www.mydutchroots.com/windmill/newsitem.asp?id=474
[Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).
Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.]
http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
If you want to be nerved up about global dissaster, be my guest- I'll be watching the clouds for the Son myself.