[Peach]

Hello? Try reading, just a tad, okay?

The freeper in question seemed to suggest that Giuliani had some part in all this OBL/AQ business. Now, if you're suggesting that everyone who voted for Clinton is responsible for 9/11, then I think you're out to lunch.

And you seem not to know that Giuliani chopped NYC crime by 57% and slashed homicide rates by 65% which his policies. But do carry on.

[Just mythoughts]

No suggestion about it, crime in New York City is a local issue and what the next election is about is credibility.

Rudy was not willing to put his name to the test to run this past election against Hillry in a Senate race, what makes you believe he has what it takes to take her on in a presidential election. He already voted for her as co-president.

Hillry will run so far to the right that Rudy will appear to be a leftist or a rich corrupt Republican when she gets done wrapping up his packaging.

Thanks to McCain/Feingold she has the extended arm of the MSM to close up her electioneering 60 days before the election.

Nice to see you expose your need for personal NE etiquette jabs. I think they fall under Hillry's rules of ridicule.

[jammer]

The freeper in question seemed to suggest that Giuliani had some part in all this OBL/AQ business.

I backtracked the "Reply To" on this post and it ended with mine. Am I the "freeper in question" that you refer to? If so, that's an absurd imputation. G didn't have anything to do with OBL, pro or con, as far as I know. He was a ruthless, unethical, dishonest prosecutor with only his own interests at heart. That's the point I made and clearly wrote.