To: Combat_Liberalism
I agree. Rudy will provide leadership. He is effective. He gets things done. I realize that the GOP is a big tent. Rudy may not be the Christian Conservative candidate, but he fits under that tent. Also, the alternative are weak. Barbour may be a candidate worthy of contention, but he needs more exposure and gravitas. He might be a good VP candidate. I don't thing Condi will run, especially since Iraq is such a problem. McCain is not reliable. He voted against the taxcuts.
Romney is a moderate (tell me why Romney would be better than Rudy). GIVE ME ANOTHER CANDIDATE THAT CAN BET HILDEBEAST!
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
That's the real issue. So we have:
*can beat the democrat's nominee
*strong leader
*strong on terrorism
*tough on crime
* moral enough to reject millions from a Saudi shiek
*ready to elect justices in the mold of Alito and Roberts
and damnit that's not good enough for these 100%ers. Forget about Mitt too as some here feel that he is a "cult member". That leaves us with...........
oh yeah, Hillary as our next POTUS. With FRiends like these...
148 posted on
11/19/2006 8:37:56 AM PST by
HelloooClareece
(Support the CinC during WARTIME or get outta my way.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson