Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine

" Calling for unbridled majority rule is akin to sedition, imo."

Are you saying the referendum process in several states is seditious?

Are you saying a political movement that would champion an amendment to the US Constitution to implement a national referendum would be sedition?

Have you ever heard of CA Prop 13? Are you opposed?


665 posted on 11/20/2006 6:41:27 AM PST by Sunnyflorida ((Elections Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]


To: Sunnyflorida
"-- SUPER MAJORITIES RULE --" so claim certain misguided freepers:

"-- What makes a government a republic or a democracy, and how does this distinction relate to politics today?

Democracy as a form of government has been described as a "mobocracy," because it represents mob-rule, or the unbridled will of the masses.
In short, a simple majority has unlimited power to restrict or eliminate the rights of any minority or individual citizen.
-- In reference to the dangers of unbridled majority rule, the Framers had repeatedly warned against the "excesses of democracy."

Thus the Framers of our Constitution decided in peaceful assembly in 1787 to create a representative republic under a written Constitution. "The American Experiment" as it has been called, was the first time a government had been instituted in which the common people retain the majority of their rights and the ability to govern themselves, while at the same time the minority and individual were protected from the arbitrary or selfish desires of the masses.

The principal instrument which accomplished this was the Constitution, the supreme law of the land which formed our government, and provided the standard by which all subsequent laws are measured."

We are all pledged to support & defend the Constitution. - Calling for unbridled majority rule is akin to sedition, imo.

Are you saying the referendum process in several states is seditious?

What gives you that idea? -- Read the above for 'what I said'; defending unbridled majority rule is akin to sedition, imo. ..

State referendums are 'bridled' by both Article VI and the 14th Amendment, are they not?

Are you saying a political movement that would champion an amendment to the US Constitution to implement a national referendum would be sedition?

If that proposed amendment 'championed' ignoring our individual rights to life, liberty or property, -- you better believe it would be seditious.. - Can you agree?

Have you ever heard of CA Prop 13? Are you opposed?

I worked and voted for it. Nothing in prop 13 violates human rights. - Can you agree?

670 posted on 11/20/2006 7:02:03 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson