Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mysterio
A property owner should be able to have control over his or her property rights while he or she owns the property. The property owner should not be able to force the next owner to sign away property rights as a condition of sale.

Then you don't understand property rights. I can't help you with that. As a condition of sale I can exercise my property rights to only sell to people who agree to abide by the HOA.

And I don't have an HOA and would never want to live in one. But I hate FReeper nutcases who can't understand simple logic.

SD

202 posted on 11/17/2006 12:21:54 PM PST by SoothingDave (Save the Cheerleader. Save the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
I understand that property rights have been twisted into what you describe, where a neighborhood can strip the property rights from a new buyer forcefully. But that's not property rights by any sane definition. That's property rights like communism is freedom.

So, tell me again why you can't make the HOA voluntary?
209 posted on 11/17/2006 12:27:15 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson