Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supremedoctrine

any criminal mind that would contemplate 'snatching' a gun from the side of a constitutionally protected citizen, would probably have the 'nerve' to already be armed...

and yes, the deterrent of having a third, fourth, fifth ad nauseum 'citizen' to contend with would definitely make said criminally minded perp rethink his behavior.

now, as a libertarian, i am for the 100% concealed carry ability, assume everyone is armed, be polite and watch everyone's six.

i have no problem with released felons owning handguns... no ones god given rights can be taken away. that is what inalienable means to me.

teeman


115 posted on 11/22/2006 9:05:37 PM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: teeman8r

I know and recognize all of what you said on yr. belated post #115--I just like to re-state the usual reservations as they come to me. But I WOULD have a problem with a "released felon" being allowed to carry a handgun, whether it bolsters the "inalienable" concept or not.
Especially if his being a felon involved the use of a handgun in armed robbery,etc.---allowing him to carry would be like restoring driving privileges to a DUI who killed or seriously injured a pedestrian or other driver.


116 posted on 11/22/2006 10:07:10 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("Talent hits a target no one else can hit, genius hits a target no one else can see"--Schopenhauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson