To: trisham
"The first assertion we still make is that priestly celibacy is relevant because our Lord Jesus Christ is relevant who, consecrated Supreme and Eternal Priest by the Father, chose to live his priesthood in chastity and celibacy. We cannot forget, Pope Paul VI states in the encyclical Sacerdotalis coelibatus, that the Son of God, who assumed a perfect human nature and raised marriage to the dignity of a sacrament, remained throughout his own earthly life in a state of perfect virginity, to signify his total dedication to the service of God and the human race.1" I guess Jesus' example should count for something.
118 posted on
11/16/2006 11:32:48 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Aquinasfan
I guess Jesus' example should count for something.Ya Think?!?
;)
119 posted on
11/16/2006 11:33:30 AM PST by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: Aquinasfan
I guess Jesus' example should count for something.*************
One would think. It's funny that so many here see celibacy as some kind of punishment, when it is my understanding that it is partly designed to free a priest from responsibilities that would distract him from his role in the Church and parish. It is a choice, a way to serve God more completely. Ironic, I think that it is so often viewed otherwise.
127 posted on
11/16/2006 11:37:47 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson