Posted on 11/15/2006 8:24:09 AM PST by Nalu
Sources close to the investigation say Abramoff has provided information on his dealings with and campaign contributions and gifts to "dozens of members of Congress and staff," including what Abramoff has reportedly described as "six to eight seriously corrupt Democratic senators."
LOL - cute. But for the people out there who get their news from the MSM, they really don't know... for them, there's only Foley.
Does that question present problems for you?
Are you talking about that Dem from the 80's that was busted having sex with pages?
I'm trying to clarify who you are talking about.. but you are avoiding?
Do you expect everyone to know everything you do?
Yes, I am talking about him. Studds or some such name - it wasn't a big story at the time - well, not a story at all. He was a dem - and dems get handed passes by the MSM as they're doing the crime or deed or whatever. Why wait, right?
He died recently and the MSM came up with a host of excuses about why it wasn't a big deal then, but is now. I love MSM excuses - they're so lame -- maybe it's because they only have to persuade each other. And that's like a really low bar, really, really, low bar. Think teacher's pet coming to school and saying the dog ate her homework for the 80th time - and - low and behold - the teacher believes it again!!! It's that lame.
I totally agree with you that it's lame.. but it's just as lame that people allowed the MSM to sway them with the Foley scandal.
One man does not make a party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.