To: kriztine rosales-viray
I wonder why it is that writings by those who would pontificate on communication are the least communicative examples of written English...
2 posted on
11/15/2006 5:05:29 AM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
6 posted on
11/15/2006 5:25:42 AM PST by
Matchett-PI
(To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
(3) Pragmatic Theory is also use to verify certainty. For this theory, knowledge is certain and true when it is put to use in struggle for survival. Survival and power. Politics is full of pragmatists whose beliefs are based on how much power they can wield with them. However their problem is not metaphysical as much as willfull ignorance or willfull deception.
7 posted on
11/15/2006 5:32:12 AM PST by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
9 posted on
11/15/2006 6:00:12 AM PST by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
Another wonderful exposition of communicatons theory. I could hardly put it down. Please keep them coming.
(You have my permission to use this as a 'blurb' on your forthcoming self-published book. Please spell my name right: W-I-L-D-B-I-L-L With no space between. It's a form of communication about my inner angst and consequent rebellion against society)
11 posted on
11/15/2006 6:10:35 AM PST by
wildbill
To: kriztine rosales-viray
hey I like anything with the word epistemology in it...i'm not kidding......to be or not to be....si?....there are more things in heaven and hell than are dreamt in your philosophy Horatio.....a thought which quartered hath but one part wisdom and ever three parts coward....i do not know why yet I live to say this things to do....
Thanks
12 posted on
11/15/2006 6:34:55 AM PST by
wildcatf4f3
(If it weren't for lawyers we wouldn't need 'em)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
You left out the "post-modernists". Where exactly do they
stand in the epistemological wars?
Who is "little john?"
AFter reading for and writing your "blurb" what is your
position on epistemology? Or do you believe there is
truth in a synthesis of positions, a little here, a little
there?
Anyway, salamad po!
13 posted on
11/15/2006 7:03:44 AM PST by
Getready
(Truth and wisdom are more elusive, and valuable, than gold and diamonds)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
Lets see --
Long vanity post
Title with a colon included
Long, funky, $20 dollar words
Hyphenated last name
OK, I'll just do a drive by post without reading the original posting.
BTW - Do those two gents in the poster suffer from Kabuki Syndrome?
14 posted on
11/15/2006 9:00:13 AM PST by
ASOC
(The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
Thank you so much for this interesting and informative post!
19 posted on
11/15/2006 11:40:24 AM PST by
betty boop
(Beautiful are the things we see...Much the most beautiful those we do not comprehend. -- N. Steensen)
To: kriztine rosales-viray
To: kriztine rosales-viray
I believe the gentleman to whom you refer is properly known as S.W. Littlejohn and the work to which you refer is his
Theories of Communication.
HERE is a course taught by Lyle Flint of Ball State that attempts to address some of the issues in your article.
I remain a touch skeptical about this essentially postmodern attempt to put window-dressing on undergraduate-level philosophy, and I am both philosophically and politically very much in opposition to Dr. Lyle's interpretation, but I think that you might find it interesting nonetheless. Thanks and have a nice evening, and welcome to FR.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson