[calex59]

Your statement is false, because he broke federal law, the rest of my statments stand and are true. Illegals have no legal standing in our courts except for liberal judges who legislate from the bench. All illegals in this country deserve what ever happens to them because they are law breakers and brought their problems onto themselves by being here illegally. If you can't see that you are indeed blind to the fact that ALL illegals are law breakers. If this person had stayed home, he would never have been injured, at least not working at a job he held illegally. Whether he lied to his employer or not, he was employed illegally, thereby breaking federal law.

The judge was simply wrong if he thinks the illegal broke no laws, not only wrong but a complete idiot.

[Sandy]

because he broke federal law,

As I said, that's irrelevant to the case at hand, which concerns NY state law and whether that state law is preempted by *one specific* federal law, IRCA.

All illegals in this country deserve what ever happens to them because they are law breakers and brought their problems onto themselves by being here illegally.

That may be your opinion, but it's not the law in the state of New York.

Whether he lied to his employer or not, he was employed illegally, thereby breaking federal law.

Again, that's your opinion as to what federal law *should* be. But that's not what the federal law actually *is*. Like I said, it's Congress's duty--not the court's--to change the law.

The judge was simply wrong if he thinks the illegal broke no laws, not only wrong but a complete idiot.

You might want to actually read the decision instead of jumping to erroneous conclusions. Just a thought.