Replies

LOL, Sammy. I do so love our 'discussions'. Well I call them discussions but it's mostly me correcting you and then you calling names. But I've come to expect such from your sort. You asked a question, I provided not only a Supreme Court Justice's opinion (matter of fact the man who wrote the dissent in Roe v. Wade), but also the directions where

A) the correct view is found in the Constitution and
B) a general location for the Framers' view confirming said argument(I will get you to read the Federalist Papers one day...perhaps it's today?)

And for my brief interjection into the discussion I get name calling. I realize logical arguments do sail over your head, and actual Constitutional discussions are a bit out of your purview, but surely Sam you could provide just a few, however brief, words from the Framers supporting your supposition that this power was ever intended to lay in Washington? No Coulterisms, no Rushdie wisdom, just a few simple writings from the Framers of the United States Constitution that states the majority of issues internal to a state or its citizens were to be determined by the national government

Please note, and I realize this will pain you, that even if a Constitutional Amendment were to be passed on abortion, quality of life discussions, the number of green M&Ms in a bag, etc (and this is assuming someone would be dumb enough to do it) that the final say would come down to the state legislatures, again confirming that this issue has been and always will be resolved by the separate and sovereign states.

As you have yet, or ever, been able to actually counter my points I want you to squint real hard, turn that brainpower on, and come up with a good name this time will you? I'm pulling for you. Really I am...