[Apercu]

Stranger things have happened in politics but I doubt Lieberman would switch.However, he did say several months ago in an interview he wouldn't forget what the DNC did to him.

[steve-b]

Wishful thinking. In the 2008 elections, the Republicans are defending 21 seats and the Democrats are defending 12 -- ergo, the 2009 Congress will almost certainly have a Dem majority without Lieberman (i.e. if he overplays his hand now the Dems will pay him back later).

[Beagle8U]

I wonder if anyone has considered that if the RATS go truly nuts that Casey or Webb could jump?

[Checkers]

I made a mistake.

Dean Barnett is the author above, not Hugh Hewitt.

Sorry about that!

[smonk]

we need to start better dealing this guy right away.

[Thumper1960]

Loyalty and demoncrats?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.....WHOOOO-WHOOOOO.....HAH-HUH-HUH-HAHAHAHA

What an oxymoron,

The only person demoncrats have been loyal to is......well....ummmm......Marx?....Lenin?.....Castro?.....hmmmmm......Comrade Clinton and Hildebeast?......sheesh.

Certainly not loyal American citizens!

[Republican Wildcat]

Lieberman is doing this to remind the Democrat leadership he is holding the cards - and to not treat him like dirt again like they did before. He has them right where he wants them - and they'll give him whatever he wants, probably.

[Clintonfatigued]

It would be a great, ironic development, but I don't see it happening. At most, Lieberman will be more likely to break with his party on a few issues.

[nutmeg]

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.