Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2006 8:27:51 AM PST by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Checkers

Pure b.s.wishful thinking.


2 posted on 11/13/2006 8:29:43 AM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

wondering if liberman will remember who left him to twist in the wind?


3 posted on 11/13/2006 8:29:44 AM PST by Walkingfeather (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Very simple. This is Lieberman's way of making sure that he gets all of the committee assignments that he wants. Why should he make a commitment to the Dems before they make a commitment to him?


4 posted on 11/13/2006 8:30:15 AM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Lieberman is in a pretty good spot and a thorn in the side of the Dems.

Interesting: he wouldn't have won without the GOP. A lot of republicans voted for him.
6 posted on 11/13/2006 8:32:45 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I think Joe is enjoying being "courted", at least in the media, by both parties.

Why would he commit...and lose all that "love"?


7 posted on 11/13/2006 8:33:08 AM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

The only way Joe would consider this is if he plans on retiring after next term. I doubt he could get re-elected if he did this and the media would destroy him.


8 posted on 11/13/2006 8:33:14 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Joe would jump off the 51 ship onto the 49 ship?

Sorry, but someone's chain is being yanked.

10 posted on 11/13/2006 8:33:48 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I saw him on one of the talk shows yesterday. He was pressed on this by Wallace or Russert (I forgot whom since they are eminently forgettable shows). There's no way he's going to leave the Democrats.


13 posted on 11/13/2006 8:34:34 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Joe is keeping the option open to extract more from the Dems. That's all it is.


14 posted on 11/13/2006 8:35:09 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

We need to say it over and over. Lamont, lost big time -- in a Northeast liberal state.


16 posted on 11/13/2006 8:36:52 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Why doesn't Lieberman run for Senate majority leader? He could get the votes. Why is he letting Reid dictate the leadership positions?


17 posted on 11/13/2006 8:37:31 AM PST by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
This kind'a crap clues you in on just how far we've fallen... hoping that Joe Lieberman switches parties.

Ughhh...

18 posted on 11/13/2006 8:38:04 AM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Joe isn't going anywhere unless the dems really goes nuts, even then I doubt it. Joe is just having some fun driving the kossacks nuts. And, I can't blame him.


23 posted on 11/13/2006 8:46:17 AM PST by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Any move Lieberman made would be countered by Hagel officially going to the dark side.


26 posted on 11/13/2006 8:52:31 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Perhaps something like a Majority Leader Murtha might do the trick.

Murtha is in the House. So august is the Senate that a Senator would hardly deign to notice who might be the majority leader of the lower chamber.

27 posted on 11/13/2006 8:53:17 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

He's only blackmailing the dems, not that there's anything wrong with that.


28 posted on 11/13/2006 8:53:59 AM PST by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Lieb's way of getting the Dims to kiss his butt on everything.


29 posted on 11/13/2006 8:57:16 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

Lieb's way of getting the Dims to kiss his butt on everything. It'll work too.


30 posted on 11/13/2006 8:57:40 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

I believe that none other than William F. Buckley and the National Review group helped Lieberman get elected the first time; seeing him as a more conservative Democrat than the incumbant at that time.... (was it Lowell Weicker?, anyone?).


31 posted on 11/13/2006 9:01:24 AM PST by AmericanDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers
Not happening. It's equal parts leverage for getting choice committee assignments and sticking it to Dem leadership for supporting Lamont.

No one should mistake Lieberman for a moderate because of his position on Iraq and his calculated criticism of Lewinskygate. He's a dyed-in-the-wool socialist.
32 posted on 11/13/2006 9:01:30 AM PST by Give Piece A Chance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson