Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kuma
What saddens me about the Iraq war is the fact that W didn't understand that a large part of the enemy that he intended to fight were right here in the United States.

I speak, of course, of the socialist (Communist) left of the RAT party. These coward traitors hated W because he won election in 2000 in spite of all their election fraud. A hate like no other, phsycopathic in nature, created an amoral group. No treason was too large to destroy W.

W didn't recognize this. For reasons of his and his administration's safety (and following, the safety of the nation) these people should have been removed form any position of influence in all executive agencies and military (there were a few). W failed to take any action whatsoever.

History propelled W into a position where war was required and his government was filled with Rat traitors dedicated to destroying Bush regardless of the consequences for America.

The result was the original war plan for Iraq was hobbled and then quickly scrapped, and it was a plan that had three key unifying ex-patriot Iraqi individuals that may have reduced dramatically all casualties, the sectarian violence, and made the war shorter and tolerable for the American people.

It was Rat state department operatives that got this plan bumped off. Rat CIA ops engineered the Valerie Plame hoax. It all comes to Rat insider treason in time of war. If they hadn't been on the inside, they couldn't commit the treason, despite how badly they wanted too.

316 posted on 11/11/2006 2:38:21 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: Navy Patriot

It's true. There was a huge opportunity to clean house that was squandered right after 9/11. The incompetency of the CIA, FBI and other National Security organizations. The complicity of the State Dept always being in favor of negotiating with terrorists.

The RATS played their hand well on an unsuspecting Bush with unity in the public eye and division behind closed doors.

I do remember times Bush attacked even fellow Republicans when they were rightfully calling Dems treasonous. What for? To keep a bipartisan tone in Washington D.C.? We all know Bush campaigned on being a uniter not a divider but things changed more than what I think he realized.

Now with the appointment of Gates I'm really getting nervous. It sounds at this point as though he's in favor of negotiating with the terrorist regimes still in existence in the ME. We can only hope that the Repubs left in Congress will not let his nomination go well and that Rummy has to stay on a lot longer than expected. This will give us time to find a pro-WOT candidate who can swing this back around. I still think that's a possibility. I at least want it to be so. Allowing the status quo of Sadr, Iran and Syria is suicidal.

Saner minds must prevail.


354 posted on 11/11/2006 12:06:36 PM PST by kuma (Mark Sanford '08 http://www.petitiononline.com/msan2008/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson