To: George W. Bush
I think we should be the first of the two major parties to appoint a woman as chairman, does anyone have any thoughts as to who she could be? What about Kay Bailey Hutchinson?
155 posted on
11/11/2006 4:33:47 AM PST by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: moose2004
Not sure if appointing a woman is all that effective, especially for us. The feminist thrill has faded.
In truth, Hutchinson is considered too 'moderate'. But is actually no more liberal than Steele is.
We sound like triangulating Clinton liberals if we try to calculate whether The Woman is more suited than The Black.
I like Steele because he ran a good campaign and is a broad conservative. I can tolerate his limited support for affirmative action. As far as I know, he is pro-life and adheres to the smaller government/limited government conservative principles. So he is still my pick over Hutchinson.
To: moose2004
I think we should be the first of the two major parties to appoint a woman as chairman, does anyone have any thoughts as to who she could be? What about Kay Bailey Hutchinson Michelle Malkin ?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson