Logic, right strategy, don't mean nothin.
The dims wanted power and were willing to mischaracterize, sacrifice everything good and turn it into failure in order to gain their power.
When we fail in Iraq because of them they will not care as long as they are in power. Of course it won't be their fault so everything is fine.
As long as they are in power.
"Power is not a means; it is an end, One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." - George Orwell [Eric Blair] (1903-1950) "1984"
"The dims wanted power and were willing to mischaracterize, sacrifice everything good and turn it into failure in order to gain their power.
When we fail in Iraq because of them they will not care as long as they are in power. Of course it won't be their fault so everything is fine.
As long as they are in power."
That hits the nail squarely on the head.
The Democrats would have found an issue to bash Bush with.
If Iraq wasn't around, they were ready to bash Bush over Katrina and over the drug program, or over 'not fully funding' no child left behind, or ... something.
Iraq was just an issue to get them power. *NOW* it's their baby too, to fix or to ruin.
Rumsfeld out solves only the issue of who to blame. He's gone and can be scapegoat of whatever perceived failures happened prior. However, since he was