Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973

You cut it short for good reason. Post 80 and 82 are clear.


122 posted on 11/09/2006 4:53:30 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: kinoxi

your posts are very clear....very clear......very clear...Spock would say illogical in your thought process but very clear....we all got what you said its in post 108 too


125 posted on 11/09/2006 4:56:31 PM PST by Luigi Vasellini (What do you call 2 toddlers and some duct tape??........muslim body armor!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: kinoxi
You also don't need to make up names like 'vanity'. He's got enough principle to at least use his real name.

So, in other words, 99% of FReepers who use a screen name have no "principle" either. Way to sink yourself even further.

As for your original premise that endorsing Liberman was ok b/c he's "pro-defense," the Republican who was running against him was also pro-defense but the Bushbots don't care about that, do they?!

129 posted on 11/09/2006 5:01:18 PM PST by Tamar1973 (I find your lack of faith disturbing--Darth Vader, Ep. IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson