Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

I don't get your point. The British monarchy had not exerted much control over the colonies. They had been left to develop self-government through an evolutionary process over a period of a century and a half. When the King and Parliament tried to tighten up and exert more control, the Americans revolted. Thus the "American Revolution" was conservative. It was not a case of a people who had been under a powerful absolute monarchy, as in France, suddenly overthrowing that system and trying to fabricating a new one from scratch, and tearing apart traditional all traditional authority, including that of the Church, as in France and Russia. Those were real "revolutions."


136 posted on 11/10/2006 7:10:01 PM PST by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: hellbender
It was revolutionary not just for what they threw off, but for what they established in it's place.

If the Founders were "conservatives", how would you categorize those who chose to remain loyal subjects of the Crown?

139 posted on 11/10/2006 7:26:56 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson