Posted on 11/09/2006 7:00:49 AM PST by Dark Skies
New York -- NewsMax has learned that U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton will likely leave his post next month.
After a rocky series of Senate confirmation hearings, Bolton was sent to the U.N. by President Bush in August 2005 under a recess appointment. That allowed the president to bypass Senate confirmation while it was in recess, but the appointee could only serve for the length of the current Congress which is set to expire at year's end.
There had been indications that Bolton might win Senate confirmation after the election when several key votes might be open to favoring Bolton. But the GOP's apparent loss of the Senate has doomed that hope.
"This nomination is dead and we have known it for several days," a source close to the U.S. mission to the U.N. tells NewsMax.
"We just don't know what the White House wants to do next," the source added.
Bolton has won high marks for his role at the U.N. as he has dealt with several crises, especially with North Korea, Iran, and the recent crisis between Israel and Lebanon.
President Bush has strongly supported Bolton and has repeatedly called upon the Senate committee to allow the nomination to go to the full Senate for an "up and down vote." Senate Democrats again blocked such a vote Wednesday evening.
Bolton has been one of the administration's few high-ranking conservatives. During Bush's first term, Bolton served as under secretary of state for arms control and international security.
At that post he aggressively pursued rogue state's like Iran who have been developing weapons of mass destruction. Bolton has been credited in getting Libya to agree to dismantle its WMD program.
Bolton's principled and sometimes confrontational approach has not won support from many congressional Democrats.
"The Bolton nomination will not get voted on," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., reportedly has told colleagues.
Another leading Democrat, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., a long-time Bolton nemesis, seconded Reid's position on Wednesday. Biden is expected to become chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when the new Congress convenes in January.
While Bolton's office in New York has not commented on developments, NewsMax has learned that the White House is considering reappointing Bolton under the same recess appointment provision. There is a hiccup: Bolton would be forced to serve without pay, an unlikely alternative sources say.
Among those believed to be on a White House short list to replace Bolton is former Senate majority leader and prominent Maine Democrat George Mitchell.
Why can't John Bolton be recess pointed again?
Time to get the anti-UN pics and screeds we used during the Clinton admin. out of deep storage.
Bring back Jeane Kirkpatrick!......
He can, but he would have to serve without pay (per the article).
Too bad there's not a reasonable dem senator from a state with a Republican governor.
Great idea! Can they do that?
What difference would it make? The UN isn't going to cooperate with us, regardless of the ambassador. Now we can send someone who actually likes the organization. It doesn't matter. They'll just sit around and chat some more.
You remember a few months back there was a thread there that said that bj wanted the UN General position....and when it went to another person, they showed a pic of bj, he looked like he had lost his last friend...
I'm sure Mrs. thunderthighs has talked to Mrs. hotshot and that is the 'plan'....
Maybe John Bolton would like to run for President, or as VP ...
How 'bout that Lickme Chafeme? Way to go.
:-(
Bolton has been wonderful there, but he's wasted on the pitiful U.N.
I'm hopeful that there's bigger and better plans for him.
I can't think of any reason that wouldn't work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.