Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
Well now Bush doesn't have to pretend anymore. He can be the DEM he always wanted to be.

I can't say you are alone in that observation. I suggested once 4 years ago Bush was governing left of Clinton on everything but Security. I still have the marks left from offering that for debate. Wow, was I trounced.

That being what it is, wonder where the newly elected "Blue Dogs" dems will stand on this issue? Many of the seats picked up in the south were essentially Republicans running as Democrats. Bush/Pelosi/McCain-Kennedy et. al. might find opposition they don't expect.

The Republican majority was full of RINO's, is Nancy's parlor full of DINO's? This is a strategy we'll need to be on the watch for in the future elections.

122 posted on 11/09/2006 5:33:12 AM PST by IamConservative (A mans true character is revealed in what he does when no one is watching.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: IamConservative
That being what it is, wonder where the newly elected "Blue Dogs" dems will stand on this issue?

If they want to be booted their next term all they have to do is support amnesty. Some coming up for re-election may take notice as well. I think amnesty will be a hard sell at this point. Supporting it then as far as ever wishing to regain the conservative vote again would be political suicide.

235 posted on 11/09/2006 10:49:55 AM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson