To: chimera
I think what Rush was saying that the conservatives did not get real suppport from the top down. When you support the likes of Spector over Toomey, for example, it starts a trend. Rather than educating and communicating the positive side of conservatism, and getting people excited about your ideals, then the message is lost. Plus, actions speak louder than words, and neither the Senate nor the House did anything to advance smaller government or cut spending.
They blew it.
36 posted on
11/08/2006 5:07:51 PM PST by
gramho12
(God help our country)
To: gramho12
>>Plus, actions speak louder than words, and neither the Senate nor the House did anything to advance smaller government or cut spending.
I've seen a lot of young lefties (leaning left, not moonbat left) hammering the Republicans over spending.
We missed a lot of swing votes over this issue.
69 posted on
11/08/2006 5:24:23 PM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: gramho12
I think what Rush was saying that the conservatives did not get real suppport from the top down. When you support the likes of Spector over Toomey, for example, it starts a trend. Rather than educating and communicating the positive side of conservatism, and getting people excited about your ideals, then the message is lost. Plus, actions speak louder than words, and neither the Senate nor the House did anything to advance smaller government or cut spendingIt was from the top down. Bush needs to take most of the blame. He had the hammer to veto spending bills, etc. His responsibility was to set the example. He flat failed us for 6 yrs.
98 posted on
11/08/2006 5:42:05 PM PST by
Digger
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson