Skip to comments.
New York Plans to Make Gender Personal Choice
The New York Times ^
| November 7, 2006
| DAMIEN CAVE
Posted on 11/07/2006 9:38:11 AM PST by Sopater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
11/07/2006 9:38:12 AM PST
by
Sopater
To: Sopater
The destruction of rationality and logic continues unabated.
2
posted on
11/07/2006 9:39:12 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - the world's only re-usable political suicide bomber.)
To: dirtboy
As Calvin Miller wrote somewhere in The Singer trilogy:
"Culture raved"
...and people think Mayor Bloomberg has great political potential? Not!
3
posted on
11/07/2006 9:41:43 AM PST
by
Tirian
To: Sopater
Err, what about these:
4
posted on
11/07/2006 9:42:56 AM PST
by
cartan
To: Sopater
If gender is merely a matter of attitude, why not speciation?
Hey, everybody, I'm a duckbill platypus.
No, really.
5
posted on
11/07/2006 9:45:20 AM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: dirtboy
This is definitely crazy. I know a few transexual people (about 3 or 4) and they have a lot of psychological baggage. Two of them have worked a lot of it out through therapy, but still, I just don't understand the phenomenon. I can understand one being gay--because it is an attraction. But the trannie thing is purely psychological (as is being gay)--Hey what if I don't want to accept being human and claim I am a hippo (if I don't watch my weight, they'll probably mistake me for one)---can I register myself as one?
6
posted on
11/07/2006 9:45:34 AM PST
by
brooklyn dave
(Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
To: Sopater
OOH I wonder if we'll start to see bearded men with big boobs in NYC????
7
posted on
11/07/2006 9:46:36 AM PST
by
brooklyn dave
(Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
To: cartan
well Number two looks a little funny!!!!
8
posted on
11/07/2006 9:47:37 AM PST
by
brooklyn dave
(Dhimmis better not be Dhummis!!!!------or else!!!)
To: Sopater
Marrying goats is right around the corner!
9
posted on
11/07/2006 9:48:22 AM PST
by
RexBeach
("Important principles may, and must be, inflexible." -Abraham Lincoln)
To: Sopater
Can Eminem change his race to Black, and Michael Jackson change his to White?
10
posted on
11/07/2006 9:48:55 AM PST
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Sopater
Perhaps this is a back door attempt to allow gay marriage. If this change goes into effect it will be impossible to tell who is male and female without performing a strip search.
11
posted on
11/07/2006 9:49:14 AM PST
by
lews
To: brooklyn dave
We've discovered the gay gene! At last!
12
posted on
11/07/2006 9:49:36 AM PST
by
cartan
To: Sopater
Ridiculous. Gender is not "constructed"
13
posted on
11/07/2006 9:49:49 AM PST
by
tdewey10
(Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
To: Sopater
Is this legalizing Gay Marriage?
14
posted on
11/07/2006 9:51:16 AM PST
by
msnimje
(You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
To: Sopater
New York City is moving forward with a plan to let people alter the sex on their birth certificate even if they have not had sex-change surgery. Doesn't this mean that boys can now change their birth certificates and join the girls high school athletic teams and shower with them after the games?
15
posted on
11/07/2006 9:51:27 AM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Sopater
It's too bad that only 5 years after 9/11 - the very city hit the hardest would enact such nonsense. You would think that the people in decision making positions would be on their knees every day praying to God and giving thanksgiving that they are still alive instead of walking around proudly making a mockery of the human race.
To: Sopater
Somebody with a beard may have had breast-implant surgery. Its the permanence of the transition that matters most. If that's the case, what does that oh-so-permanent DNA say.
17
posted on
11/07/2006 9:51:54 AM PST
by
LexBaird
(98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
To: Sopater
If approved, the new rule would put New York at the forefront of . . . queer moonbatty kookdom.
18
posted on
11/07/2006 9:52:38 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Why won't Diebold talk about RYMB.DLL?)
To: okie01; cyborg
And I'm a hairless yeti.
(I have a t-shirt to prove it.)
19
posted on
11/07/2006 9:53:24 AM PST
by
Petronski
(Why won't Diebold talk about RYMB.DLL?)
To: Sopater
affidavits from a doctor and a mental health professional laying out why their patients should be considered members of the opposite sex, and asserting that their proposed change would be permanent. Sounds OK to me, as long as the doctor, mental health professional and patient are immediately fitted with strait jackets and committed to nearest loony bin!
20
posted on
11/07/2006 9:53:36 AM PST
by
maryz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson