To: rface
In the 2000 elections, Noren said, Missouri had a problem with too many people being removed from the list, which made them unable to vote. She said the possibility of a few people casting votes in place of the dead is better than taking away the rights of legitimate voters because of “aggressive” removal policies. I thought that a provisional ballot remedied the wrong removal of a registered voter from the rolls, while the fraudulent dead-voter was a problem without remedy. Gee, inconvenience versus fraud... I guess they decided to go with fraud.
6 posted on
11/03/2006 9:05:05 AM PST by
MortMan
(I was going to be indecisive, but I changed my mind.)
To: MortMan
I thought that a provisional ballot remedied the wrong ......Funny - that's exactly what I thought
8 posted on
11/03/2006 9:08:11 AM PST by
rface
("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
To: MortMan
I thought that a provisional ballot remedied the wrong removal of a registered voter from the rolls, while the fraudulent dead-voter was a problem without remedy. Gee, inconvenience versus fraud... I guess they decided to go with fraud.and the dems in Maryland are screaming about Republicans having written guidelines for poll watchers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson