[bvw]

Wikipedia is not under oath nor even under cross-examination. The masters of Wiki are those with no other way to express "truth" except by sticking to the "truth" framework they'd like. If the truth is different, damn it to wiki-oblivion -- that is the driving force that motivates many a wiki-master. The need to enforce a "truth".

[Steve Van Doorn]

But this is not factual information.
Isn’t this like stating the nuclear weapons little boy and fat man where made 10 years earlier then they where. It is just factually inaccurate.