Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.
175 posted on 11/02/2006 10:00:38 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: jveritas
I will try to contact Scott Shane tomorrow the guy who wrote this NYT article. He interviewed me last March in an article he published back then totally dismissing the documents. Suddenly he and the New York Times are so interested in these documents.

You, or someone, should tell Rush about this.

180 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:45 PM PST by waimea.man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

There must be a reason, i.e., hidden agenda, as to why the NYT released this report now. I can't believe that they would believe foolishly that this would harm Bush. Maybe the WH was getting ready to release it or some other damaging information prior to Tuesday. Whatever the motivation, the NYT has validated the documents.


187 posted on 11/02/2006 10:08:28 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson