Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas
Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.
That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html
So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.
What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.
On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.
The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????
Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts
Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .
Also this one
Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts
No long explanations, we need to keep this as SIMPLE as possible for the largest possible audience.....
"New York Times Mistakenly VALIDATES Bush's Reasons For Iraq War!"
there...
That should do it...
I am headed to bed now, so I am saving my place for the morning.
I just hope I can sleep.
You have me so excited...(Politically speaking, of course) LOL
Night all!
(gotta go to bed now)
Yes they have, and I don't have enough popcorn for the ensuing MSM meltdown.
Just a hunch, Joseph, but I think you are going to be the "star" of Talk Radio tomorrow! Woo Hoo!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts
This link is NOT working!
"(gotta go to bed now)"
Same here...
Something tells me Friday is going to be a VERY interesting day.....
BTTT
I never knew who had made the actual call to the charity, I just remembered that it seemed as though Fitzgerald had singled out Miller because of her obvious connections to all parties involved in the Plame case and seemed to be on a fishing expedition with Miller.
Good night and thanks for all your help to spread the word of truth.
Are you sure? it just worked when I clicked on it.
Thanks for the incredible work you've done.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly
All Freepers: Check maine-iac7's post #177 for some great links to help git 'er done!
.
Let's ROLL!
Bingo!
It is a beauty--and the best part is it comes straight from the NYTimes, the paper of the elites. There they are bringing attention and credence to the documents. ALL OF THEM. And they were too blinded by partisanship to figure out that angle in their rush to take down President Bush.
Tomorrow the world will see that "Bush was right". And I am going to laugh myself silly. Oh and eat chocolate.
It did for me too, but when I clicked on it from your original article post, it told me that the requested document was not on the server, or something close to that. hmmmmmmmmmmm. A byte must have gotten bit. I don't know.... but its a key part of your thesis and so I thought I should bring it up... When people say that just one person can make a difference, they are talking about YOU Joe! Say "hi" to all the Big Mucky Mucks you are going to meet from all the FReepers out here, 'cause I think you are about to become Famous! Rightly SO!
I figured it out, the HYPERLINK that is behind the TEXT of the link is broken. The TEXT that you see on the page is correct, but what it points to is NOT. Admin should be able to correct that easy.
The 2nd and 3rd docs show up as missing when I try to retrieve them......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.