Posted on 11/02/2006 6:57:42 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
U.S. Congressional Democrats are vowing to press for a change of course in U.S. policy on Iraq if they regain control of one or both houses of Congress in Tuesday's midterm elections, as public opinion polls suggest is possible. VOA's Deborah Tate looks at how Democrats plan to influence such policy if they do win victories at the polls.
With the increasing U.S. death toll and continuing violence in Iraq, the war has become a key issue in this midterm election.
Public opinion polls indicate Democrats are in a strong position to pick up at least 15 seats needed to wrest control from Republicans in the 435-member House, and could possibly win the six seats they need to take back control of the 100-member Senate. Polls suggest voter dissatisfaction with President Bush's handling of the Iraq war is what is helping the Democrats.
Carl Levin Carl Levin Senator Carl Levin, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, says the midterm elections have become a referendum on the war. "There is going to be a very powerful message to change course in Iraq next Tuesday," he said
Democrats, if they win control of the House and Senate, would be in a position to influence Iraq policy, as they would assume chairmanships of congressional committees.
Senator Levin, for example, would become chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. He has called for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq beginning next month. It is a plan, he told reporters in a conference call, that voters would essentially be endorsing if they return control of Congress to the Democrats. "The message will hopefully be a (change to a) Democratic Congress, and if that is the result, I believe that will be read correctly as a very strong message to the President that the American people want to change course in Iraq, and want to begin a reduction in our presence there by the end of the year," he said.
But Democrats are divided over whether and how many troops to withdraw within a certain time frame, or even whether to increase the U.S. military presence.
It is a point President Bush underscored at a campaign appearance for Republican Senator Conrad Burns in Montana Wednesday. "We're in the middle of a war on terror, and one of the most fundamental fights is in Iraq, and yet the Democrats have no plan for victory. They have no idea how to win. Harsh criticism is not a plan for victory," he said.
President Bush opposes any timetable for a phased withdrawal of troops, and criticizes Democrats who support the idea as, in his words, cut and run Democrats.
But the chairman of the Democratic Party, Howard Dean, argues that Democrats do not want an immediate pullout of troops. He made his point in a recent CBS Face the Nation program. "The president will still be in charge of foreign policy and the military. So the influence of a Democratic Congress will be, I think,a positive influence, but I don't imagine that we're suddenly going to force the president to reverse his course. We don't have the ability to do that. But I think we will put some pressure on him to have some benchmarks, some timetables and a real plan other than stay the course," he said.
Democrats also say if they do take control of Congress, they would urge the administration to press the Iraqi government to do more to make the political compromises necessary to bring stability to their country.
Michael O'Hanlon of the Brookings Institution has co-authored a book that advises Democrats about foreign policy. "If Democrats do win, I would propose the following: that President Bush and the leadership of the Congress actually try to work out a basic concept, where they will agree that Prime Minister al Maliki is doing a bad job in Iraq right now. The only way we have any hope of salvaging the situation is if he or someone else in that position does a much better job on issues such as ensuring equal sharing of all oil revenue for all Iraqis forever, regardless of what province you are from on a per capita basis, equal sharing, on issues like rehabilitating former Baathists, who do not have blood on their hands personally, so they can rejoin public life; in other words, dealing with legitimate Sunni-Shi'ite grievances," he said.
Besides looking ahead with respect to Iraq, Democrats are also planning to look back, if they retake control of Congress. Democrats are vowing to hold hearings on what led to the administration's decision to go to war in Iraq, as well as investigate the misuse of government funds spent by U.S. contractors in Iraq. "That is something that is needed regardless of who is in control. There should have been a commission looking into the whole contracting errors and worse. There have been some real corrupt practices here which need to be investigated," said Senator Levin.
Besides choosing lawmakers, voters in several states will also have a chance to directly express their opinion about the war. A referendum will appear on the ballot in cities in Massachusetts, Wisconsin and Illinois, asking voters whether the United States should immediately withdraw troops from Iraq.
"Senator Levin, for example, would become chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. He has called for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq beginning next month. It is a plan, he told reporters in a conference call,"
The plan. Get out as soon as we can.
To hell with the people and gov't left behind.
Can someone tell me just what exactly does Howard Dean do? Aside from rant about Republicans?
One of my sons is being deployed in January. The worst possible thing that could happen is the DemoRats regain control and strand his unit over there without any support.
From one where we kill terrorists and establish a free government in the Isalmic world to...
Is he saying "to hell with the American people" as well. The enemy will be arriving at our door again like on 9/11 if we crawl home in defeat. These Liberals are pathetic cowards!
More proof that Democrats hate the constitution, given that under it U.S. foreign policy is explicitly and exclusively the responsibility of the executive branch.
You said a mouthful.
I appreciate the comment.
Bush can veto a cut in existing funding, but a democrat congress can pass bills that don't provide anymore. This is exactly what they did to Vietnam.
Pelosi-galore... Dinghy-Dirty Harry.... and the rest of the Dim-Dhimmi-Dems can buzz off....
What would a good job look like?
Victory undefined leads to the perception of defeat, and defeatism. Ask them to define victory, and you will see how far out of touch they are with reality.
"Senator Levin, for example, would become chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. He has called for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq beginning next month. It is a plan, he told reporters in a conference call"
-------
Plan on being in the minority, Carl.
That's right. If the Dims have their way, their social engineering will "go up in flames" Pun intended.
Again, I am not worried because we will keep both the House and the Senate.
Yes, the Kerry flappermouth is giving the Dems a HUGE boost in the polls when it comes to national security ... NOT!
Yeah, the demoCommiecRATS will say "we ARE in Charge Now" this is our War Plan:
""We Surrender", Communists, Socialists, Terrorists, Thugs and Assasins one and ALL come over here and chop our heads off to your delight" You can do it while we still tax the living Americans to death, while we wait for you to chop their heads off!" "Come On Enjoy, We Surrender, come over and chop our heads off, we do'nt care!"
:-(
If the Dems somehow cut funding for our mission in Iraq, then we'll just have to use some very cost-effective methods to fight the terrorists there. Like lots of big bombs. I'm serious, that's what Bush would do. He's not going to let the Islamo-terrorists win there.
Oh and also my son is a college graduate who enlisted after graduation. Pretty much reduces Shanghi John Kerry's comments about our military to a joke on John.
You're right, but the next attack will make 9/11 look insignificant in comparison. On 9/11, three planes struck three buildings. (No, I'm not forgetting those brave souls on Flight 93.) Imagine what three or four US cities disappearing in a flash of white light would be like.
That's what's at stake next week.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.