To: mwl1
Yes, from National Review
The New York Times just tore the heart out of the antiwar argument, and they are apparently completely oblivous to it.
http://tks.nationalreview.com/
368 posted on
11/02/2006 8:12:00 PM PST by
gb63
To: gb63
Yes, but is it possible that our logic will see the light of day with the MSM? Will the Administration be given a chance to point out the obvious?
369 posted on
11/02/2006 8:14:35 PM PST by
mwl1
To: gb63
Yes, from National Review
My favorite lines from the National Review article:
The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasn't dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet...
...The information in these documents is so dangerous, that every step must be taken to ensure it doesn't end up in the wrong hands... except for toppling the regime that actually has the documents.
To: gb63
Wow, this NRO piece is GREAT!
I cannot believe how the Dimocrats think they are going to really bury us and then end up shooting themselves in the foot.
By tomorrow afternoon, I can gurantee you this, People will start to believe that Rove was behind it.
What a magnificent bastard!
375 posted on
11/02/2006 8:23:57 PM PST by
JerseyDvl
("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson