Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1

Yes, from National Review

The New York Times just tore the heart out of the antiwar argument, and they are apparently completely oblivous to it.

http://tks.nationalreview.com/


368 posted on 11/02/2006 8:12:00 PM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]


To: gb63

Yes, but is it possible that our logic will see the light of day with the MSM? Will the Administration be given a chance to point out the obvious?


369 posted on 11/02/2006 8:14:35 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

To: gb63
Yes, from National Review

My favorite lines from the National Review article:

The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasn't dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet...

...The information in these documents is so dangerous, that every step must be taken to ensure it doesn't end up in the wrong hands... except for toppling the regime that actually has the documents.
372 posted on 11/02/2006 8:20:38 PM PST by TheCornerOffice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

To: gb63

Wow, this NRO piece is GREAT!
I cannot believe how the Dimocrats think they are going to really bury us and then end up shooting themselves in the foot.
By tomorrow afternoon, I can gurantee you this, People will start to believe that Rove was behind it.
What a magnificent bastard!


375 posted on 11/02/2006 8:23:57 PM PST by JerseyDvl ("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson