Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
"The point is that Saddam wasn't supposed to have this know how
Right. That is why we are all saying this story may be a setup for the NYT - they opened the door. Let us see what we find here now......
361 posted on 11/02/2006 8:02:22 PM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]


To: gb63

National Review - Geraghty's column - already shreds the Times position. This presents no political problem and may even be a plus.


364 posted on 11/02/2006 8:05:02 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

To: gb63
Check out this little quote,“For the U.S. to toss a match into this flammable area is very irresponsible,” said A. Bryan Siebert, a former director of classification at the federal Department of Energy, which runs the nation’s nuclear arms program. “There’s a lot of things about nuclear weapons that are secret and should remain so.”

I guess Saddam should have been more careful with his secret nuke program.
370 posted on 11/02/2006 8:15:13 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson