Well, there it is. It's a dud. In that it's something the Dems and the MSM can spin endlessly but there are probably A LOT of holes in the story. In other words, an attempt to get the Kerry flap off the charts. I'm still of the mind that Rove and Co. have something up their sleeves.
Wait a minute........so Saddam had Nuke info that Iran DIDN'T and DOESN'T have?
But we didn't have to worry about IRaq?
Uhm..........okay.
""Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency""
LOL!
Like Iran didn't purchase Russian science a decade ago, and from Pakistan.
so let me see if I have this straight...
There were no WMDs in Iraq, and there is no evidence that Saddam was researching them or working to acquire them, but when evidence of said research is posted publically, it might help other badguys with research, even though there is no evidence of WMDs in Iraq, and the other guys were further along in their nuke program?
Only the New York Times could come up with that story.