Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Landru
The AQ -- whateverinthehell *it* "is" -- was "sold" right about the time Clintigula was elected for the first time, 1993 I believe.

I'm not aware of any transaction or realignment of the AP during that period of time(unless there was something under the table???). Their HISTORY doesn't indicate anything either. What have I missed my friend?

Just remember *we* may not have heard all the detail(s), BUT, the BIG print media Liberal-Socialists have diversified & been diversifying for some time to Internet, entertainment *and* television based venues.

That seems true enough, but they may be late to the dance and more importantly where news is concerned, people that cruise the internet are for the most part "hip" to their game. And FWIW, most of the broadcast media aren't exactly setting the world on fire right now. Hollyweird??? It may take several years to see how this will all shake out. Do we have time?

30 posted on 11/08/2006 12:24:13 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake
>The AQ -- whateverinthehell *it* "is" -- was "sold" right about the time Clintigula was elected for the first time, 1993 I believe.
"I'm not aware of any transaction or realignment of the AP during that period of time(unless there was something under the table???). Their HISTORY doesn't indicate anything either."

Welllll, lemme see.
You'd send me *to* the AQ to get the rundown *on* the AQ written *by* the AQ?
HA!!

"What have I missed my friend?"

Ummmmm, *who* you listen to for certain fact(s) regarding certain *things*?
Just guessing, mind you.

Wished I had the resources ("Nexus"?) for ferreting-out that exact date, Curtis.
But I clearly recall the sale, and I'm too young to be experiencing [any] dementia yet, I *think*. :o)

In the same time-frame -- 92ish-93ish -- the AQ changed (Fill in the Blank) I also clearly recall hearing "news" -- from somewhere -- the United States of America was going to be experiencing drastic changes in the way their "news" was going to be presented.
I recall the source saying the "news" we get would become a LOT more in line with what the Europeans were getting.
I took [that] to mean "news" would become more "Tabloid", and it certainly has.
Right?

>Just remember *we* may not have heard all the detail(s), BUT, the BIG print media Liberal-Socialists have diversified & been diversifying for some time to Internet, entertainment *and* television based venues.
"That seems true enough..."

Well, we're in agreement on something anyway.
Thank God, today's been a real bugger.
Starting with my learning the outcome of the local & national political races; which, led directly to informing my beautiful bride her family -- all Liberal-Socialists -- will not be welcome in *my* home for any reason, beginning with Thanksgiving.
Hellova way to start the day, ol' pal.
Say what're you doing for T'giving? {g}

"...but they may be late to the dance and more importantly where news is concerned, people that cruise the internet are for the most part "hip" to their game."

Liberal-Socialists "cruise the net" too, my friend.
Don't believe me?
Start with www.democrat-underground.com & go from there.
They'reeeeeeee herrrrrreeeeee.

"And FWIW, most of the broadcast media aren't exactly setting the world on fire right now."

After what we just witnessed you can say that with certainty, huh.
Waylon Jennings sang some sage advice in a beautiful song he wrote, said: "Be careful of something that's just what you want it to be".
I understand you're way to wily to let that happen, but hell I've done it so it's easy, happens to the best of us.

"Hollyweird???"

Yea, especially Hollweird.
Motion pictures with themes that're anti-capitalist, anti-conservative, anti-religion & twice as many with pro-homosexual etc themes are the rule, not the exception and its been like that since, when?
Say 1993, or so?

The young skulls full of mush as well as those old enough to know better actually believe much of the crap they watch on the silvery screen/television.
That's a fact.
So it only makes sense for Liberal-Socialists to get Hollyweird on the same ideological page is crucial to any Liberal-Socialist agenda.
And so it is.

"It may take several years to see how this will all shake out."

We shall see.
Pelosi & Co are not going to permit this opportunity to slip through their fingers, not on your life.
If you & I thought the propaganda from AQ etc was bad before, we ain't seen nothing yet.
Just wait'll the incoming Liberal-Socialists get going with their *plans&, the purveyors of bullshit are all set & ready to fallout to give 'em the best cover money can buy.
Wager? ;^)

"Do we have time?"

Yea, nothing but.

...where the hell we goin'?

33 posted on 11/08/2006 1:16:48 PM PST by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson