two wrongs don't make a right
just because Webb's campaign is vile doesn't mean Allen should stoop to his level
just because Webb's campaign is vile doesn't mean Allen should stoop to his level
Allen didn't stoop to Webb's level. He just quoted from his book. But as Ann Coulter reminds us, merely quoting a Democrat is enough to piss them off. Democrats don't like their own writing either.
You signed up today to defend a smarmy democrat? I doubt you'll be around here for long. If you want to defend pedophiles maybe you should go back to DU.
On the other hand, a negative multiplied by a negative equals a positive.
Poor Webb can sure dish out the macaca but cries to mommy when his own vile words get served back up to him.
> just because Webb's campaign is vile doesn't mean Allen should stoop to his level <
In what sense is it "stooping" to point out writings of an opponent that have been in the open, on the public record so to speak, for many years? And is the information in any way false?
In any event, should the citizenry of the Commonwealth be deprived of this information? Should Webb's naughty prose be hidden from public view? Moreover, if the WaPo is too prudish to tell the voter about Webb's take on Asian pedophilic fellatio, what's wrong with the Drudge Report's having done so?
Methinks the Old Dominion's voters are amply qualified to sift the chaff from the wheat, and to decide whether Webb's strange writings should disqualify him from a post of high trust in the U.S. Senate.
And since Virginia most certainly ain't Hollywood or Manhattan, it ain't hard to predict how a majority of Virginia voters will view the issue.
Look for me on your other site. You'll recognize by my tag line, Go Dems. Don't blow my cover.