Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly on Oprah!

Posted on 10/27/2006 1:41:33 PM PDT by roostercogburn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 last
To: No Blue States
Oprah didnt interfere too much.

That's why she has been on top as long as she has been. She knows how to conduct an interview. She knows when to talk and when not to. She's a master at it. She's class all the way. It was a very good show. The best thing was O'Reilly explaining why we went into Iraq and why it was important. There are so many people who just really don't know. The funniest was that ugly woman who appeared to be reading from Code Pink's website and O'Reilly just shined her off. That's what you have to do with people like that. There's not talking to them. THEY REALLY ARE THE MIND NUMBED ROBOTS. You could sit them down, with documented proof, interviews, signed affadavits and they'd pop back like those plastic clown dolls and just repeat the same tired old lines. I had a woman like that in my life. I had to drop her. It's just too infuriating.

181 posted on 10/28/2006 10:08:14 AM PDT by Hildy (Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: srmorton

Thank you.


182 posted on 10/28/2006 11:13:34 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I couldnt help but chuckle when he dismissed that moonbat.
Exactly what she deserved. He had tried to reason with her and she ignored him and responded with more DU talking points. At that point he shrugs her off as not worth talking to and looked away. hahaha

Im not Oprah fan, but I cant ignore the fact that she gave a right winger a free voice in regular TV prime time which is very rare.(compare to Letterman later)

Imo this show changed at least a few minds for the better.


183 posted on 10/28/2006 11:32:01 AM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
"You're using excellent as an adverb, you should have said excellently."

Allright, let's have a test... where do you use this : and where do you use this ; ?

Shalom

184 posted on 10/28/2006 11:39:02 AM PDT by patriot_wes (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - may they prosper who love thee...Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

GREAT is an understatement. I have never seen her look better! WOW!


185 posted on 10/28/2006 11:47:58 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: onyx
O'Reilly also has other very naive notions
Did you ever listen to rantings in regard to the recent rise in oil prices. (And now subsequent fall!...I wonder if his explanation for this event is that oil company executives woke up one morning and decided to be less evil !)
His economic knowledge is on the order of a high school mall rat!
186 posted on 10/28/2006 12:19:36 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Reily


I love to watch Cavuto take him to the woodshed.


187 posted on 10/28/2006 12:22:18 PM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
He does come out on some good points, but I am sick of his 'being for the folks'. He is for bor, period.

I listen until he starts bashing W, or talking like HE knows what W should do, then I turn him off. Sometimes, that is during his 'talking points'.

188 posted on 10/28/2006 12:24:13 PM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reily

O'Reilly is a smarter man than Rush.


189 posted on 10/28/2006 1:42:49 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
Very little evidence in his statements!
Of course your assertion is not proof either.
O'Reilly economic notions run the gamut from naive to ignorant to silly !
Rush's views on economics are demonstrably more correct.
We have the historical physical evidence of the market to show the correctness of Rush's core economic views.
Also O'Reilly buys into the 'Global Warming' scam which I think he does because he thinks its hip !
190 posted on 10/28/2006 2:21:21 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Rush also believes the Earth is getting warmer. He doubts we are causing it.
Pretty much in line with Bill's thoughts.
And which economic views of O'Reilly's to you consider ignorant or silly?


191 posted on 10/28/2006 3:29:08 PM PDT by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson