"But is that appropriate in an almost-300-year-old HISTORIC property?"
I'm afraid I can't answer that question. The decision was not mine. The thing is that the cross will be brought in when Christian services are held. At other times it will not. That was the decision. It was not my decision. I'm merely trying to explain why it might have been made.
I guess asking the person who made it would get a clearer answer.
Already trying to get an answer. I can't imagine that the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation would allow this to happen, but who's to say. Historians are far too disgustingly PC these days—it's any wonder we know
anything about our history at
all...
Regards,
~dt~