Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
Or a synagogue, perhaps. Last I heard, the Jews don't believe in the symbol of the cross, either.

MM, that's not the issue—and you know it. This is about the College trying to remove a Christian symbol from a room that has been a Christian chapel for almost 300 years! (2032 isn't that long away...) Can't the school provide some other space for its non-Christian students, whether Jewish, Hebrew, or Muslim, that would not interfere with the accurate portrayal of the College's Christian heritage and history? (The Wren Chapel is a part of Colonial Williamsburg, which is a "living museum" of the Commonwealth's second capital, and as such, should be expected to realistically depict life in the 18th century!)

Or is nothing Christian allowed to be sacred any more?

Most Respecfully,
~dt~

15 posted on 10/27/2006 10:16:47 AM PDT by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: detsaoT

Apparently the college decided otherwise. If it is THE chapel for that college, then the decision makes sense to me.

The military does the same thing on small bases. If there is just one chapel, no symbols of a particular religion are in the chapel, except when there is a religious function in the chapel. If the Protestants are there, a plain cross is on the wall. If the Catholics are there, a crucifix is on the wall. If a Jewish service is being held, appropriate symbols for that service are brought out. And so on. It is how a single building can be a chapel for all persons on the base.

Looks to me like a similar thing is going here.


16 posted on 10/27/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson