The problem is that he tried to get us to clarify what the definition of the word is is by declaring that he did not go to a Playboy MANSION party. He also makes a big bruhaha about his piety, shooting ads from church pews.
OK. As I said, I haven't been following this that closely. Sounds like the usual semantics nonsense. Lots of that going around in campaigns everywhere. More to come in the remaining days before the election.
I guess I don't pay much attention to campaign ads and other such nonsense. I study up on the races I can vote in and vote accordingly, based on a candidate's record or statements on issues if there isn't a record.
All the ads are is eye candy for voters who can't be bothered to learn anything.
This Playboy business is some of that.
You know, years ago, I actually went to a Playboy party. I was writing about the computer industry and went to Las Vegas to a big convention. Playboy, which was doing some nonsense on its brand new web site, threw a party for the media that was there.
It was in one of those huge ballrooms in one of the big casinos. No naked women were there...I never saw Hefner. I ate some prime rib, drank a couple of drinks, saw some other journalists I knew, then went back to my hotel.
Still, if someone asked me if I had attended a Playboy party, I'd say yes. They'd probably have visions of something other than what I saw there. It was just like every other corporate party I've been to.