Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: juliej
It is not a big loss: the legislature may pass a gay marriage bill;

So what? That was possible even without this decision. The gays wanted the court to discover a constitutional right to gay marriage. That didn't happen; they lost.

88 posted on 10/25/2006 12:42:24 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Sandy

They did not lose. Any judicial imposition of same-sex union recognition is an illegitimate act by the Courts. Only the most radical demand the word 'marriage' as well, while the more clever are content (for now) with gaining what is in effect gay marriage in all but name.


100 posted on 10/25/2006 12:48:19 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Sandy
So what? That was possible even without this decision. The gays wanted the court to discover a constitutional right to gay marriage. That didn't happen; they lost.

The most certainly did not lose.

The NJ Supreme Court has discovered a constitutional right to gay civil unions, which the Legislature must pass, which must be the equivalent of the marriage statute in all but name. They won everything except the name, which is 99%.

115 posted on 10/25/2006 12:57:43 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Sandy

They will be back - they are not giving up - they will go to the gutless legislature and they will get one. The decision stated that it is unequal not to have marriage for members of the same sex - it gave the legislature cover.


177 posted on 10/25/2006 1:45:49 PM PDT by juliej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson