[dcnd9]

According to DRUDGE REPORT: http://drudgereport.com/


"'Committed same-sex couples must be afforded on equal terms the same rights and benefits enjoyed by opposite-sex couples under the civil marriage statues.' MORE...

At this point, the Court does not consider whether committed same-sex couples should be allowed to marry, but only whether those couples are entitled to the same rights and benefits afforded to married heterosexual couples.' DEVELOPING.."

[angcat]

Anyone have today's NY Post?

[Jim Noble]

What is absurd about this decision is that all men in New Jersey already have the right to marry a woman, and all women in New Jersey already have the right to marry a man.

The fact that some men and some women choose not to exercise that right does not call for a remedy, constitutional or otherwise.

Let's say I'm an alcoholic. Let's even say God made me that way.

Laws that say the bars close at 2AM don't violate my rights, just because I want to keep drinking.

Why is this not a precise analogy?