Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative in nyc

Wait, I really really don't get that.

You mean to tell me NJ has already got domestic partnership? Then what is this case or ruling even about?


274 posted on 10/25/2006 4:29:38 PM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: gidget7
The New Jersey Domestic Partnership law wasn't comprehensive enough, according to the New Jersey Supreme Court Black Robed Legislators. What the legislature thought about the matter at issue simply wasn't good enough. From the summary of the opinion:

"The Domestic Partnership Act has failed to bridge the inequality gap between committed same-sex couples and married opposite-sex couples. Significantly, the economic and financial inequities that are borne by same-sex domestic partners are also borne by their children. Further, even though same-sex couples are provided fewer benefits and rights by the Act, they are subject to more stringent requirements to enter into a domestic partnership than opposite-sex couples entering a marriage."
322 posted on 10/25/2006 7:25:23 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson