Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
Are these the same clowns who re-wrote Election Law for the Democrats?

2-4 of them were appointed by McGreevey after the Toricelli case was heard. It's unclear whether 2 of those 4 were on the court at the time - one has no bio on the court's website; the other was appointed in 2002. The other 3 were originally appointed by Whitman and were on the court at the time.

If I recall correctly, the NJSC traditionally has 3 Republicans and 3 Democrats at all times. The seventh judge is from the party that holds the governorship.
112 posted on 10/25/2006 12:55:38 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc
I've got a better count. 4 or 5 of these clowns also re-wrote the law in the Torricelli case. 4 of the NJSC justices deciding the case were originally appointed by Whitman, 3 of which thought civil unions weren't enough - it must be called marriage. 1 of them, the former Chief Justice, reached retirement age and is no longer on the court, but ALL of those 4 justices were on the NJSC at the time of the Torricelli case.

3 of the justices were appointed by McGreevey. 1 of the 3 was appointed in 2002 and may have been on the court at the time the Torricelli case was heard. ALL of the McGreevy-appointed justices (and 1 other justice originally appointed by Whitman) voted that the legislature must enact equal homosexual civil unions, and need not call it marriage - ironically enough.
179 posted on 10/25/2006 1:46:19 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson