You have that completely opposite, the Theory of Evolution has proven itself in the scientific venue, it has done it over and over again, through new discoveries, new evidence and peer review.
ID has done none of that, it makes no predictions, it has not been peer reviewed, it has no evidence, it was attempted to force it into science class via popularism, not scientific validity.
Why has ID not attempted experiments, why has it not made predictions, why has it not been willing to be peer reviewed, because it is not scientific, and never has been.
The reason that it went to court, is because it was trying to bring itself into a science class, before being scientifically vetted, it was trying to sneak in the back door, instead of doing what all scientific theories that are taught in a science class must do.
There is no competition to evolution, because there is no other theory or hypothesis that explains the evidence as well, or scientifically. Id does none of that, and again, attempted to sneak in the back door.
Any scientifically verifiable theory, should be willing to be scientifically vetted, why is ID above this?
Hey, that is what the ID adherents are asking for, to be placed into the arena to be challenged. It should be a piece of cake for evolutionists to completely discredit it in a classroom setting.