Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mom MD
For one example, in my college years I was fed the "ontongeny recapitulates phylogeny" line as a great proof of evolution. only one problem - it doesn't.

Could you provide evidence to support this assertion? It does not correspond to references that I have seen. I will attempt to locate these references, but I have found some information here.

and many scientists feel the current estimates of the timeline to the big bang does not leave enough time for evolution.

Please provide a reference to support this claim.

In order to have evolution, you need adequate energy sources, as evolution flies in the face of the second law of thermodynamics. This is explained away by evolutionists as being due to the injection of outside energy into the system - the energy comes from cosmic rays, the sun, other sources that have everything to do with cosmology.

Are you saying that the external energy input from the sun is insufficient for evolution to occur? If so, then please explain this claim by showing the energy required for evolution to occur and demonstrating that energy input from the sun is inadequate. If not, then please explain exactly how evolution "flies in the face" of the second law of thermodynamics.

Was there a reducing atmosphere on the young earth as evolution requires?, etc

Explain how evolution requires this. Also, are you suggesting that, if evolution requires such an event, that evidence suggests that this did not occur?
435 posted on 10/25/2006 10:29:18 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio; Mom MD

So even if she kills herself to *provide evidence to support her assertion*, how are YOU going to know if it's valid? Do you have the level of education that she does? Do you have the level necessary to understand and analyze any and everything she might post? Then what? You're going to sit in judgement and tell her it's not good enough after all? Or is she going to be expected to back up with more evidence the evidence she's already provided, as infinitum?

Why should she answer to you anyway? Who are you that can go around demanding answers to the same questions you pose everybody you have a discussion with? *Please provide evidence to support your assertions*. Do YOU ever do it? I don't really ever recall you reciprocating in kind.


454 posted on 10/25/2006 10:40:49 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson