To: Mamzelle
This was posted Oct 22, and many, many times before that. Probably hundreds of times. Possibly thousands of times on FR. And he keeps posting it, in the hope that one day some creationist will actually read it, and not say the same old "if it was really true, it would be a law, and not a theory" nonsense.
414 posted on
10/25/2006 10:12:35 PM PDT by
wyattearp
(Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
To: wyattearp; Mamzelle
Specially made-by-frevos definitions of words are not really authoritative.
417 posted on
10/25/2006 10:16:29 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: wyattearp
It was just a list of definitions. The dictionary is full of them. If the Theory of Evolution is unassailable then, in the hands of a competent educator, there should be no problem putting it up against ID in the classroom. You and yours are fond of calling those that take the ID side of the debate ignorant. That may be so BUT, like it or not, a majority of your fellow countrymen believe in some form of intelligent design and they bring those beliefs with them into the classroom. If you and yours are secure in your science then you should be able to cure their ignorance in short order.
430 posted on
10/25/2006 10:25:29 PM PDT by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson